Our contact with the State oversight offices did get us responses from Harbors Division. Unfortunately the reply to our March 12 letter was not answers to the issues we raised, but only a comment that Harbors is following the procedures they have started. The request for the report on the bow repairs did come in once Harbors got the letter from the Office of Information Practices advising them that they violated the time to provide requested documents. A copy of what we received was sent to David O’Neill as he had requested.
Friends of Falls of Clyde’s board has been concerned that time is limited to protect the ship from adverse action by Harbors Division. We continue to communicate with the regulatory agencies that must give approval before Harbors can remove Falls of Clyde. We know that so far no contacts have been made, but the Scotland Plan for repatriation has got to be completed soon. We have sent O’Neill our position on how to finalize the move, but have had no reply. We have a letter from Harbors Division stating that they will release the ship from impoundment when there is a vessel here to remove the Falls..
Friends of Falls of Clyde’s board has been concerned that time is limited to protect the ship from adverse action by Harbors Division. We continue to communicate with the regulatory agencies that must give approval before Harbors can remove Falls of Clyde. We know that so far no contacts have been made, but the Scotland Plan for repatriation has got to be completed soon. We have sent O’Neill our position on how to finalize the move, but have had no reply. We have a letter from Harbors Division stating that they will release the ship from impoundment when there is a vessel here to remove the Falls..
RSS Feed