The Friends of Falls of Clyde
  • Home
  • Volunteer
  • History
  • Events
  • Resources
  • Ship's Log
  • Ship's Crew
  • Supporters
  • Did You Know?
  • Contact Us

16-30 September

10/1/2016

0 Comments

 
As the saying goes, the other shoe has fallen. We received the Decision and Order (D&O) from the Hearing Officer and he decided in favor of the Harbors Division. We were very disappointed, but not surprised because we thought the decision would be made based on a narrow interpretation of the issues. However, we disagree with some of the facts that were relied upon. The D&O stated: “Indeed, the State continually communicated and met with the Petitioner in an effort to resolve the State’s long-standing concerns regarding safety issues, the Vessel’s seaworthiness, and the need to repair portions of Pier 7.” What are the facts? First, every time the matter of safety was raised, there was never a specific reason for Harbors Division’s allegation. When the Revocable Permit was terminated, safety was not even mentioned. How could there be such important safety issues if they could never articulate what they are? The issue of seaworthiness was never raised. Under maritime law, a vessel is seaworthy if it is reasonably fit for its intended use. Falls of Clyde is a stationary museum ship, therefore, it is fit for its purpose. There was never any long-standing concern for seaworthiness that the Harbors Division ever raised with us, which would have been a moot point based on the definition of seaworthiness. Finally, the repair of Pier 7 was never raised until the letter terminating the Revocable Permit. 
Unfortunately, however the Hearing Officer got those “facts” from Harbors Division, they were given to undermine Friends of Falls Clyde’s efforts to get the impoundment reversed  and the Revocable Permit reinstated.
The only positive part of the D&O was the Hearing Officer not considering our arguments based on Federal and State historic preservation laws. He stated that they were not relevant to the impoundment. It is our position that when the Harbors Division takes their next step to move toward their goal of removing the ship from the harbor that those laws will be relevant.

0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Bruce McEwan, President

    We know that there is great interest in the future of the Falls of Clyde. There is a lot going on that the Board of Directors is dealing with, so we felt that keeping stakeholders involved through a report on our website is the easiest way to reach our worldwide audience.

    Archives

    January 2021
    November 2020
    September 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    May 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    August 2014

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed


    View the archive of old posts
Proudly powered by Weebly